This is a great piece on
Hinduism. As a person who has spent most of his life studying the essence of
religions, I have found humility is the bedrock of all religions, and arrogance
is the root cause of all problems in the world. Every religion without fail
prescribes prayers as its anti-dote to arrogance, and to bring everyone on par
with the other - we bow, we kneel and we prostrate as a symbol of acknowledging
a greater power.
The sentences, concepts
and the words in the following article have been a part of my understanding and
my writings over the years. Indeed, it is Bhagvad Gita that inspired me to find
the truth on my own, and eventually took me to study Quran and find resonance
with it. Indeed, Islam is square on it, you are individually responsible for
your karma and you alone are accountable for your thoughts, talks and acts.
Both books (and all the religious books) are about creating a cohesive society where all humanity can co-exist with least conflict by accepting the otherness of other and learning to value the uniqueness of each one. Poet Sahir Ludhanavi wrote this beautiful couplet in Urdu/Hindi language;
Qur’aan no ho jis may o dharam tera nahin hai
Geeta no ho jis may o haram tera nahin hai
Both books (and all the religious books) are about creating a cohesive society where all humanity can co-exist with least conflict by accepting the otherness of other and learning to value the uniqueness of each one. Poet Sahir Ludhanavi wrote this beautiful couplet in Urdu/Hindi language;
Qur’aan no ho jis may o dharam tera nahin hai
Geeta no ho jis may o haram tera nahin hai
Your religion is
incomplete without Qur’aan in it
and your worship is incomplete without Gita in it.
and your worship is incomplete without Gita in it.
Meaning the essence of
Goodness is embedded in every religion. What you hear about others is not true,
much of it is built on arrogance that mine is better, mine is superior, and even
mine is humbler... non sense it is, all religions are beautiful. If it is not,
then we have not taken the time to learn the truth but went by what suits our
ego - that others are inferior. That is not Hinduism, not Islam, not
Christianity and not any religion.
Indeed, humility is the
hallmark of every religion.
You might want to
experiment this, as I have in the past – replace the words like Bhagvad Gita
with Qur’aan or Bible, dharma with righteousness, Deen or right path and few
more like that… The Muslim, Christian or other will feel it is about his
religion. That is the power of goodness, it permeates in every
religion.
Mike Ghouse writes
weekly articles on Pluralism at Dallas Morning News and in his daily blog at www.Theghousediary.com
Now enjoy reading this piece with full humility.
HUMILITY IN
HINDUISM
Posted: 03/24/2012 9:42
pm
By contributing writer
Gautama Mehta, originally published at KidSpirit Online
Growing up in a Hindu
family in New York, I've always been taught that I should try my best, but
understand that after I've done what I personally can, I should leave the rest
to God.
Well, not specifically
God, but whatever factors there are beyond my control. There is, in my religion,
the concept of dharma, or duty: each person has his or her own righteous path to
follow, and at different times in your life, your dharma could be being a good
student, or parent, or hard worker, and so on.
Hindus are taught to
have humility. Ancient Hindu artists were never supposed to sign their names on
their work, and temple artists, when creating statues of gods, are always
supposed to leave a deliberate imperfection to show that they cannot really
represent God.
It's a religion that
decries affectation. It doesn't presume to be the one and only "true" faith:
there is no conversion ceremony. All the Hinduism I have grown up with, has
taught me to be free of misconceptions about my personal importance, my own
status when viewed against all the other billions in the world. I don't know how
"Hindu" this is, but my mother has always told me that the religion teaches only
to do one's best, and not worry about the outcome. I don't know what it means
for an idea like this to be "Hindu," as opposed to just a cultural notion that,
in my limited experience, follows the faith wherever it goes. Hinduism is like
that: Gandhi's ideals are considered just as Hindu as age-old scriptural
doctrines.
In my family (and many
others) when a baby turns one, we shave off its hair as a sacrifice to God for
the beautiful baby, and also to protect against vanity or conceit. That's the
beauty of traditions like these: we can interpret and re-interpret, internalize
and re-internalize, to fit with our culture and ethics. The root, of course, is
Hinduism, but Hinduism is evolving, is changing. It's an intensely personal
religion. There is no Hindu Church or centralized authority. Hinduism can mean
incredibly right-wing fundamentalists who use it as an excuse for violence, or
it can mean my mother, a self-proclaimed atheist who is one of the most devout
Hindus I know.
But there's a
contradiction. Culturally, Hindus (or Indians in general) have a lot of pressure
to do well, to succeed. Especially immigrant families like mine here in America,
which are the ones I know best. In general, immigrant cultures tend to value
achievement, because of how hard it is for them to make it in a foreign country
where they are poor and discriminated against. Indians in America have done
well, though. I see us in Ivy League schools and computer software, in spelling
bees and politics. And we're still stereotyped as the culture that pressures its
children into doing better than all the American kids, coaching the kids after
school in trigonometry and computer science, and if a kid isn't valedictorian in
every subject then he's beaten.
Obviously, this is an exaggeration, but the philosophy is still there -- the intense competition, the praise given for having one's name everywhere. In India, kids have an incredibly strict education system, learning everything at a much more advanced rate than I am here in New York, and students are strictly ranked in every aspect. There's a rigorous Hindu caste system only now falling apart, and still very much present in India's villages. My mother, a Brahmin (on the top of the ladder) talks about how growing up in India, she was told that she was superior to everyone else, and though she hates it, she still feels that inside her today. Harsh competition is encouraged from an early age in most Indians. So why the discrepancy between the religion and the culture?
Obviously, this is an exaggeration, but the philosophy is still there -- the intense competition, the praise given for having one's name everywhere. In India, kids have an incredibly strict education system, learning everything at a much more advanced rate than I am here in New York, and students are strictly ranked in every aspect. There's a rigorous Hindu caste system only now falling apart, and still very much present in India's villages. My mother, a Brahmin (on the top of the ladder) talks about how growing up in India, she was told that she was superior to everyone else, and though she hates it, she still feels that inside her today. Harsh competition is encouraged from an early age in most Indians. So why the discrepancy between the religion and the culture?
Perhaps the
discrimination Indians felt everywhere they went instilled in them the sense of
having to be the best, and nurtured in them the insecurity that causes the
egotism that is so warned against by Hinduism. My father's family, for example,
has spent the last four generations moving across the globe in search of
business, everywhere from a rural village in India to Kenya to Calcutta. When my
dad was 14, he moved from Bombay to Queens, N.Y., and he describes the move as
one of the most influential moments in his life. When he got here, he
experienced flagrant racism at his local Catholic high school, in which he was
the only minority student, and this has shaped the way he thinks and acts today.
But in spite of all the hardships they've faced Indian immigrants like my father
have kept religion with them, trusting it to guide them, preserving its
traditions as best they can. For him, the Bhagavad Gita, probably the religion's
most important text, is the one book he would want on a desert island. But he
didn't discover it through his parents. He found it in an undergraduate course
on Hinduism at NYU.
In this way, his
Hinduism is like mine: Growing up, he knew the Hinduism that his grandparents
told stories about, the Hinduism of gods and demons and many-headed animals. But
the other side of Hinduism, its philosophy, is something too personal to tell
kids on your lap stories about. I know Hindu mythology partly from my Ammamma
(mother's mother) telling me stories as a kid, and partly from Amar Chitra
Katha, a popular Indian comic book series illustrating myths and scripture. But
to try and understand the reasons for the inconsistencies I've seen in my
community, I decided I actually had to read the stuff.
I read through the
Bhagavad Gita, expecting to find an archaic, illegible piece of scripture that
would make no sense to me. But instead I found lines that illustrated perfectly
ideals that still make perfect sense, many centuries later.
Let me give a bit of
background on the Gita, as the book is commonly known. It's a chapter in the
epic poem Mahabharata, which is about an ancient war between two sets of
brothers. The Gita, Wikipedia tells me, was written between the 5th and 2nd
centuries B.C. It's 700 verses long.
The story of the Gita is
a conversation between Arjuna, a good-guy on one side of the war riding a
chariot into battle, and Krishna, his charioteer who's also a god. Arjuna feels
guilty about having to kill his cousins who are fighting on the other side, and
he expresses these doubts to Krishna, sitting down in the chariot, letting his
bow and arrow slip out of his hand. The result is an intense, beautiful dialogue
about life, death and reincarnation. But the part that interested me most was
when Krishna talked about ego, and "selfless service."
His initial answer to
Arjuna's questions is that it is his dharma to kill his cousins. It wouldn't be
immoral to kill them, because it is a part of the cycle of life and death that
exists for everyone. "For a warrior, nothing is higher than a war against evil,"
Krishna counsels. And anyway, even when a body dies, he says, its soul, or Self,
lives on, living forever in future and past, in an eternal cycle of karma and
reincarnation until it is finally released from karma by defeating ego and
materialism and sin. "You were never born; you will never die," he explains.
The ultimate object of
this cycle is to become immortal and "be united with the Lord." The way to do
this is to "renounce all selfish desires and break away from the ego-cage of
'I,' 'me,' and 'mine.'" In another place, he says, "Deluded by identification
with the ego, a person thinks, 'I am the doer.'"
Another theme Krishna
stresses is work. "You have the right to work, but never to the fruit of work...
The ignorant work for their own profit, Arjuna; the wise work for the world."
This, more than anything else, clashes for me with the stress my culture places
on rewards and achievement.
When I read all this, I
was fascinated by it. It resonated so truly with all the lessons I had been
taught were Hinduism. All the principles I was taught came right out of its
philosophy. The humility asked for by Krishna is simultaneously present and
absent in his followers.
I don't think that the
sense of pride only comes from immigrant cultures like mine. I think it's
present in India too. There is constant religious violence between Hindus and
Muslims, another example of the frenzied, insecure need to uphold whatever you
have. India, as many Indians will readily brag, was once a huge world power, one
of the most advanced cultures on the planet, the discoverer of zero, the creator
of our numeral system, the inventor of chess. I have heard these facts so many
times I know them and a million others by heart, all talking about "how __ India
is," how India is "the most __ nation in the world."
But India was colonized
by the British, and wherever its people went, they were put down. They were
weaker, poorer and darker than everyone else, and that had to leave a mark on
them. I don't know if I'm enough of a historian to attribute it to whatever they
must have faced, but it's easy to imagine how all those factors could contribute
to a collective need for self-esteem, that could have resulted in what I
experience today.
When he wrote this,
Gautama Mehta was 15 years old and on the KidSpirit Editorial Board. His article
is reprinted with the permission of KidSpirit Magazine and can be found here. Gautama Mehta
lives in Brooklyn, NY, and is into writing, music, art, math and social justice.
Follow KidSpirit on
Twitter: www.twitter.com/kidspiritonline
# # #
MikeGhouse is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers pluralistic
solutions on issues of the day. He is a professional speaker, thinker and a writer
on pluralism, politics, civic affairs, Islam, India, Israel, peace and justice. Mike is a
frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on Fox TV, and a
commentator on national radio networks, he writes weekly at Dallas Morning News and regularly at Huffington post, The Smirking Chimp and several other
periodicals. His daily blog is www.TheGhousediary.com
No comments:
Post a Comment